Surprising statistics that dispel the idea that Novak Djokovic is past his prime.

Despite the eulogies being composed for Novak Djokovic following his defeat at the Australian Open against Jannik Sinner, a striking statistic asserts that it is premature to dismiss the Serbian maestro.

Djokovic maintains his dominant position at the summit of the ATP rankings, particularly noteworthy in his Grand Slam performances over the past four years.

In the contemporary era of tennis, fans have become accustomed to witnessing legends accumulate numerous Grand Slam titles. However, historical comparisons reveal that sustaining such consistent brilliance is an extraordinary feat.

Tennis luminaries like John McEnroe secured eight Grand Slam titles, and Boris Becker boasts six Grand Slam singles titles—both revered as Hall of Fame greats. Yet, the current generation has been privileged to witness Roger Federer claim 20 Grand Slams, Rafael Nadal amass 22 major titles, and Djokovic surpass them all with 24 titles in the sport’s premier tournaments.

The comebacks of Federer and Nadal, overcoming injury setbacks in the latter stages of their careers, demonstrated their ongoing contention for Grand Slam titles whenever they stepped onto the court. Federer, in particular, defied expectations by winning the 2017 Australian Open after a period of injury, adding more major titles to his illustrious record thereafter.

Nadal achieved a remarkable feat by making a triumphant return from an extended injury hiatus to win the 2022 Australian Open. Therefore, it appears perplexing that Djokovic has been prematurely dismissed by certain observers as a relic of the past after a single defeat against Sinner.

A significant distinction exists for Djokovic compared to Federer and Nadal, as his setback does not stem from a severe injury. Both of his rivals have openly acknowledged harboring fears that their careers might be over during their respective absences, only to return and achieve further glory.